Статья PDF

Об авторах

Прашант К. Джамвал – Профессор Школы инженерии и цифровых наук Назарбаев Университета, Астана, Казахстан Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1330-6186

Амна Хаваджа – Научный сотрудник медицинского факультета Назарбаев Университета, Астана, Казахстан Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Дилноза Карибжанова – Научный сотрудник медицинского факультета Назарбаев Университета, Астана, Казахстан Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4285-8585

Резюме

Дети с церебральным параличом (ДЦП) сталкиваются со значительными нарушениями моторики как верхних, так и нижних конечностей, что серьезно ограничивает их способность выполнять повседневные действия. Роботизированные экзоскелеты стали многообещающим инструментом для поддержки реабилитации и улучшения двигательных функций у этой группы населения. В этой статье мы представляем две роботизированные системы, одна из которых предназначена для улучшения параметров походки, а другая - для улучшения общего равновесия у детей с ДЦП. Предполагается, что роботизированная тренировка походки улучшит пространственно-временные параметры походки, а роботизированная тренировка на основе возмущений улучшит общее равновесие (статическое, динамическое и функциональное/ постуральное) и проприоцепцию у детей с ДЦП. Благодаря нашим постоянным исследованиям мы разработали нового гибридного робота GEAR (Gait Exoskeleton-Assisted Rehabilitation), основанного на активно-пассивном механизме, конструкция которого близка к прозрачной и обеспечивает непринужденную естественную ходьбу по беговой дорожке. Мы также разработали роботизированную систему возмущения (RPS) для обучения детей с ДЦП. Мы провели первоначальные клинические испытания с использованием обеих этих роботизированных систем у детей с ДЦП и получили значительные результаты, достигшие более 20% эффекта.

Ключевые слова

Детский церебральный паралич, роботизированная реабилитация, тренировка движений, контроль равновесия, активация мышц, центр масс.

Список литературы

1. Yuri Oksamitniy, N.A., Children of Kazakhstan, Statistical Yearbook T.C.o.S.o.t.M.o.N.E.o.t.R.o. Kazakhstan, Editor. 2017, UNICEF: Kazakhstan.
2. Kumar, G., V. Sharma, and A. Kumar, Clinical Profile of Pediatric Neurology Disorders: A Study From a Semi-Urban Medical College in Northwestern India. Cureus, 2022. 14(10): p. e30359. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30359
3. Steinmetz, J.D., et al., Global, regional, and national burden of disorders affecting the nervous system, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet Neurology, 2024. 23(4): p. 344-381.
4. Zhakupova, M., et al., Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in the Republic of Kazakhstan: Incidence and risk factors. 2023: p. e14849. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14849
5. Children's rehabilitation: What will change after implementing compulsory social health insurance. 2019 [cited 2024 18/05/2024]; Available from: https://primeminister.kz/en/news/interviews/detskaya-reabilitaciya-chto-izmenitsya-posle-vnedreniya-osms.
6. Ramakrishnan, T., S.H. Kim, and K.B. Reed, Human Gait Analysis Metric for Gait Retraining. Appl Bionics Biomech, 2019. 2019: p. 1286864. DOI: 10.1155/2019/1286864
7. Mobbs, R.J., R.R. Mobbs, and W.J. Choy, Proposed objective scoring algorithm for assessment and intervention recovery following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis based on relevant gait metrics from wearable devices: the Gait Posture index (GPi). Journal of Spine Surgery, 2019. 5(3): p. 300-309. DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.06
8. Langley, B. and M. Greig, The gait abnormality index: A summary metric for three-dimensional gait analysis. Gait & Posture, 2023. 105: p. 87-91.
9. Kingsbury, T., et al., The Gait Quality Index: Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change Values for a Novel Gait Summary Measure. 2017.
10. McMulkin, M.L. and B.A. MacWilliams, Application of the Gillette Gait Index, Gait Deviation Index and Gait Profile Score to multiple clinical pediatric populations. Gait Posture, 2015. 41(2): p. 608-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.01.005
11. Lim, H., Correlation between the selective control assessment of lower extremity and pediatric balance scale scores in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Journal of physical therapy science, 2015. 27(12): p. 3645-3649.
12. Franjoine, M.R., J.S. Gunther, and M.J. Taylor, Pediatric balance scale: a modified version of the berg balance scale for the school-age child with mild to moderate motor impairment. Pediatric physical therapy, 2003. 15(2): p. 114-128. DOI: 10.1097/01.PEP.0000068117.48023.18
13. Mitchell, D.L., et al., Gaps in transitional care to adulthood for patients with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Child's Nervous System, 2023. 39(11): p. 3083-3101.
14. Dussault-Picard, C., et al., Gait adaptations of individuals with cerebral palsy on irregular surfaces: A scoping review. Gait and Posture, 2022. 96: p. 35-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.05.011
15. Colborne, C., Supporting occupational therapy outcomes for children and young people with cerebral palsy: key considerations for impactful outcomes. Paediatrics and Child Health (United Kingdom), 2024.
16. Uzun, A. and Y. Yakut, Immediate Effect of Soft Lumbosacral Orthosis on Trunk Stability and Upper-Limb Functionality in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 2024. 36(1): p. 59-66.
17. Hoşbaş, B.D. and M. Sertel, Immediate effects of kinesio taping and vibration therapy on manual dexterity in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: a randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 2023. 30(12).
18. Gehringer, J.E., et al., Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Training in Virtual Reality: A Feasibility Study. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 2023. 35(1): p. 85-91. DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000975
19. Fonvig, C.E., et al., Limited associations between passive range of motion and gross motor function in ambulant/semi-ambulant children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 2024. 39: p. 170-175.
20. Sardoğan, C., et al., Determining the relationship between the impairment of selective voluntary motor control and gait deviations in children with cerebral palsy using simple video-based analyses. Gait and Posture, 2021. 90: p. 295-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.08.019
21. Cacioppo, M., et al., Motor patterns of the impaired upper limb in children with unilateral cerebral palsy performing bimanual tasks. Clinical Biomechanics, 2022. 97.
22. Eriksson Westblad, M., et al., Long-term motor development after hypothermia-treated hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 2023. 47: p. 110-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2023.10.003
23. El Rafei, R., et al., Postnatal growth restriction and neurodevelopment at 5 years of age: A European extremely preterm birth cohort study. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 2023. 108(5): p. F492-F498.
24. Gervasi, M.T., et al., Intra-amniotic inflammation in the mid-trimester of pregnancy is a risk factor for neuropsychological disorders in childhood. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 2023. 51(3): p. 363-378.
25. Donders, J., J. Reibsome, and K. Wilson, Parent ratings of children’s daily functioning in a mixed clinical sample. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/21622965.2023.2284812
26. Katušić, A., D. Milaščević, and J. Gagula, Measurements of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja, 2019. 55(1): p. 59-67.
27. Milaščević, D., et al., Measuring advanced motor skills in children with cerebral palsy: development of normative data and percentile curves for the Challenge-20 assessment. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 2022. 45(4): p. 329-335.
28. Gusso, M.M. and P. Nohama. Possibilities and challenges for the intellectual evaluation of non-verbal children with cerebral palsy in Brazil. in 2018 Global Medical Engineering Physics Exchanges/Pan American Health Care Exchanges, GMEPE/PAHCE 2018. 2018.
29. Hussain, S., State-of-the-art robotic gait rehabilitation orthoses: design and control aspects. NeuroRehabilitation, 2014. 35(4): p. 701-9. DOI: 10.3233/NRE-141174
30. Wang, Y., P. Zhang, and C. Li, Systematic review and network meta-analysis of robot-assisted gait training on lower limb function in patients with cerebral palsy. Neurological Sciences, 2023. 44(11): p. 3863-3875.
31. Vezér, M., et al., Evidence for gait improvement with robotic-assisted gait training of children with cerebral palsy remains uncertain. Gait and Posture, 2023. 107: p. 8-16.
32. Hussain, S., "State-of-the-Art Robotic Gait Rehabilitation Orthoses: Design and Control Aspects,". NeuroRehabilitatin, 2014. 35: p. 701-709.
33. Reinkensmeyer, D.J., J.L. Emken, and S.C. Cramer, Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2004. 6: p. 497-525.
34. Hogan, N., et al., Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery. Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 2006. 43: p. 605-18.
35. Huang, J., X. Tu, and J. He, Design and Evaluation of the RUPERT Wearable Upper Extremity Exoskeleton Robot for Clinical and In-Home Therapies. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2016. 46(7): p. 926-935.
36. Jamwal, P.K. and S. Hussain, Multicriteria Design Optimization of a Parallel Ankle Rehabilitation Robot: Fuzzy Dominated Sorting Evolutionary Algorithm Approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2016. 46(5): p. 589-597.
37. Jamwal, P.K., et al., Impedance Control of an Intrinsically Compliant Parallel Ankle Rehabilitation Robot. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2016. 63(6): p. 3638-3647.
38. Chaparro-Cárdenas, S.L., et al., A review in gait rehabilitation devices and applied control techniques. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2018. 13(8): p. 819-834.
39. Schiele, A. and F.C.T.v.d. Helm, Kinematic Design to Improve Ergonomics in Human Machine Interaction. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2006. 14(4): p. 456-469.
40. Colombo, G., et al., Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2000. 37(6): p. 693-700.
41. De Luca, R., et al., Improvement of Gait after Robotic-Assisted Training in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Are We Heading in the Right Direction? Med Sci (Basel), 2022. 10(4).
42. Banala, S.K., et al., Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX). IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2009. 17(1): p. 2-8.
43. Hussain, S., S.Q. Xie, and P.K. Jamwal, Adaptive Impedance Control of a Robotic Orthosis for Gait Rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2013 43(3): p. 1025-1034.
44. Meuleman, J., et al., LOPES II—Design and Evaluation of an Admittance Controlled Gait Training Robot With Shadow-Leg Approach. IEEE Transations On Neural Systems And Rehabilitation Engineering, 2016. 24(3): p. 352-363.
45. Zanotto, D., P. Stegall, and S.K. Agrawal. ALEX III: A novel robotic platform with 12 DOFs for human gait training. in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2013.
46. Fong, J., et al. EMU: A transparent 3D robotic manipulandum for upper-limb rehabilitation. in IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. 2017.
47. van Dijk, W., et al., Improving the transparency of a rehabilitation robot by exploiting the cyclic behaviour of walking. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot, 2013. 2013: p. 6650393.
48. Kapsalyamov, A., et al., A Novel Underactuated Robotic Orthosis for Individualized Gait Rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 2024. 6(1): p. 213-223.
49. Jin, Y., et al., Design and analysis of a multi-DOF compliant gait rehabilitation robot. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 2023.
50. Jamwal, P.K., S. Hussain, and M.H. Ghayesh, Robotic orthoses for gait rehabilitation: An overview of mechanical design and control strategies. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2020. 234(5): p. 444-457.
51. Hussain, S., S.Q. Xie, and P.K. Jamwal, Effect of cadence regulation on muscle activation patterns during robot-assisted gait: A dynamic simulation study. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2013. 17(2): p. 442-451.
52. Hussain, S., S.Q. Xie, and P.K. Jamwal, Adaptive impedance control of a robotic orthosis for gait rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2013. 43(3): p. 1025-1034.
53. Hussain, S., S.Q. Xie, and P.K. Jamwal. A bio-inspired robotic orthosis for gait rehabilitation. in Proceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. 2012.
54. Hussain, S., et al., Assist-as-needed control of an intrinsically compliant robotic gait training orthosis. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2017. 64(2): p. 1675-1685.
55. Hussain, S., P.K. Jamwal, and M.H. Ghayesh, Effect of body weight support variation on muscle activities during robot assisted gait: a dynamic simulation study. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2017. 20(6): p. 626-635.
56. Hussain, S., P.K. Jamwal, and M.H. Ghayesh, Single joint robotic orthoses for gait rehabilitation: An educational technical review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2016. 48(4): p. 333-338.
57. Phillips, C.M., et al., Perturbation-Based Training on Compliant Surfaces to Improve Balance in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Feasibility Study. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 2023. 5(2): p. 242-252.
58. Adeniyi, A., et al., Utilizing mobile robotics for pelvic perturbations to improve balance and cognitive performance in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Scientific Reports, 2023. 13(1).
59. Tobaiqi, M.A., et al., Application of Virtual Reality-Assisted Exergaming on the Rehabilitation of Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2023. 12(22).
60. Stramel, D.M., et al., Effects of Timed Frontal Plane Pelvic Moments During Overground Walking With a Mobile TPAD System. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2023. 31: p. 48-57.
61. Conner, B.C., M.H. Schwartz, and Z.F. Lerner, Pilot evaluation of changes in motor control after wearable robotic resistance training in children with cerebral palsy. Journal of biomechanics, 2021. 126: p. 110601.