Article PDF

About the Authors

Suling Li – Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230022, PR China, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8433-525X 

Fuyong Jiao – Children’s Hospital of Shaanxi Provincial Peoples Hospital, Xi’an, PR China, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8306-2543 

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of modern science and technology, the field of neurorehabilitation has witnessed a surge of innovative techniques that significantly enhance rehabilitation outcomes. This review focuses on the integration of brain-computer interfaces (BCI) with functional electrical stimulation (FES), the role of virtual reality (VR) in personalized rehabilitation, the application of exoskeleton robots in neural remodeling, and the development of non-invasive neuromodulation techniques alongside AI-assisted BCI technologies. Additionally, we examine the influence of policy support and industrial dynamics on these advancements, including the layout of the BCI industry in China and the increasing global market demand. Through a systematic analysis of the latest research findings and application cases, we explore how these technologies facilitate neural recovery and improve patients’ quality of life while also forecasting future development trends in the field.

Keywords

Neurorehabilitation, brain-computer interface, functional electrical stimulation, virtual reality, exoskeleton robots, non-invasive neuromodulation, artificial intelligence, industrial development.

References

1. Wu, Y.-Y., Gao, Y.-M., Feng, T., Rao, J.-S., & Zhao, C. (2025). Enhancing Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury Through Neuroplasticity: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(14), 6596. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146596
2. Mansour, S., Giles, J., Nair, K. P. S., Marshall, R., Ali, A., & Arvaneh, M. (2025). A clinical trial evaluating feasibility and acceptability of a brain-computer interface for telerehabilitation in patients with stroke. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 22(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01607-x
3. Ma, Y. N., Karako, K., Song, P., Hu, X., & Xia, Y. (2025). Integrative neurorehabilitation using brain-computer interface: From motor function to mental health after stroke. Bioscience trends, 19(3), 243-251. https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2025.01109
4. Wankhede, N. L., Koppula, S., Ballal, S., Doshi, H., Kumawat, R., Raju, S., Arora, I., Sammeta, S. S., Khalid, M., Zafar, A., Taksande, B. G., Upaganlawar, A. B., Gulati, M., Umekar, M. J., Kopalli, S. R., & Kale, M. B. (2025). Virtual reality modulating dynamics of neuroplasticity: Innovations in neuro-motor rehabilitation. Neuroscience, 566, 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.12.040
5. Kopalli, S. R., Shukla, M., Jayaprakash, B., Kundlas, M., Srivastava, A., Jagtap, J., Gulati, M., Chigurupati, S., Ibrahim, E., Khandige, P. S., Garcia, D. S., Koppula, S., & Gasmi, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in stroke rehabilitation: From acute care to long-term recovery. Neuroscience, 572, 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.03.017
6. Chenais, N., & Görgen, A. (2024). Immersive interfaces for clinical applications: current status and future perspective. Frontiers in neurorobotics, 18, 1362444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2024.1362444
7. Mansour, S., Giles, J., Nair, K. P. S., Marshall, R., Ali, A., & Arvaneh, M. (2025). A clinical trial evaluating feasibility and acceptability of a brain-computer interface for telerehabilitation in patients with stroke. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 22(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01607-x
8. Wang, A., Tian, X., Jiang, D., Yang, C., Xu, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhao, S., Zhang, X., Jing, J., Wei, N., Wu, Y., Lv, W., Yang, B., Zang, D., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Meng, X. (2024). Rehabilitation with brain-computer interface and upper limb motor function in ischemic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Med (New York, N.Y.), 5(6), 559–569.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2024.02.014
9. Jia J. (2022). Exploration on neurobiological mechanisms of the central-peripheral-central closed-loop rehabilitation. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 16, 982881. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2022.982881
10. Guo, J., Liu, T., & Wang, J. (2022). Effects of auditory feedback on fine motor output and corticomuscular coherence during a unilateral finger pinch task. Frontiers in neuroscience, 16, 896933. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.896933
11. Lakshminarayanan, K., Shah, R., Ramu, V., Madathil, D., Yao, Y., Wang, I., Brahmi, B., & Rahman, M. H. (2024). Motor Imagery Performance through Embodied Digital Twins in a Virtual Reality-Enabled Brain-Computer Interface Environment. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE, (207), 10.3791/66859. https://doi.org/10.3791/66859
12. Ase, H., Honaga, K., Tani, M., Takakura, T., Wada, F., Murakami, Y., Isayama, R., Tanuma, A., & Fujiwara, T. (2025). Effects of home-based virtual reality upper extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 22(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01564-5
13. Huo, C., Shao, G., Chen, T., Li, W., Wang, J., Xie, H., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Zheng, P., Li, L., & Li, L. (2024). Effectiveness of unilateral lower-limb exoskeleton robot on balance and gait recovery and neuroplasticity in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 21(1), 213. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01493-9
14. Doumas, I., Lejeune, T., Edwards, M., Stoquart, G., Vandermeeren, Y., Dehez, B., & Dehem, S. (2025). Clinical validation of an individualized auto-adaptative serious game for combined cognitive and upper limb motor robotic rehabilitation after stroke. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 22(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01551-w
15. Liu H, Zhu C, Zhou Z, Dong Y, Meng W and Liu Q (2024) Synergetic gait prediction and compliant control of SEA-driven knee exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 12:1358022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1358022
16. Nolan KJ, Karunakaran KK, Chervin K, Monfett MR, Bapineedu RK, Jasey NN and Oh-Park M (2020) Robotic Exoskeleton Gait Training During Acute Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation. Front. Neurorobot. 14:581815. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2020.581815
17. Ling-Yi Liao, Yun-Juan Xie, Yi Chen, Qiang Gao. (2021) Cerebellar Theta-Burst Stimulation Combined With Physiotherapy in Subacute and Chronic Stroke Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 35, (1), pp. 23 - 32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968320971735
18. Li, F., Zhang, D., Chen, J., Tang, K., Li, X., & Hou, Z. (2023). Research hotspots and trends of brain-computer interface technology in stroke: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis. Frontiers in neuroscience, 17, 1243151. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1243151