Comparative effectiveness of hydrokinesiotherapy and conventional therapeutic exercise in hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial

    COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF HYDROKINESIOTHERAPY AND CONVENTIONAL THERAPEUTIC EXERCISE IN HEMIPARESIS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

    Article PDF


    About the Authors

    Timur Khodjaev Rehabilitation Physician, Alfraganus University Hospital, Alfraganus University (Non-Governmental Higher Educational Organization), Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3821-0929

    Dilshod Olimjonov Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Alfraganus University (Non-Governmental Higher Educational Organization), Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4544-7377


    Аbstract

    Purpose: to compare the clinical effectiveness of hydrokinesiotherapy (HKT) and standard therapeutic exercise (TE) in patients with hemiparesis.

    Methods: a prospective parallel-group randomized controlled trial enrolling 70 patients (35 per arm) over an 8-week intervention period. Outcome measures included muscle strength (MRC scale), spasticity (modified Ashworth scale), gait speed (10-meter walk test), functional independence (Barthel Index, FIM) and pain intensity (VAS). 

    Results: both interventions produced statistically significant within-group improvements (p<0.05), yet HKT was significantly superior to TE across all outcomes. MRC gain was +1.3 vs +0.6 points (p<0.001); Ashworth reduction −0.9 vs −0.4 (p=0.003); gait-speed improvement 34.1% vs 20.1% (p=0.002); Barthel gain +22.3 vs +13.4 (p=0.001); FIM gain +24.4 vs +12.8 (p<0.001); VAS reduction −2.7 vs −1.4 cm (p=0.012). No adverse events required discontinuation. 

    Conclusion: hydrokinesiotherapy is a highly effective and safe modality that outperforms conventional therapeutic exercise in hemiparesis rehabilitation and should be considered a priority intervention where appropriate aquatic facilities are available.


    Keywords

    Hydrotherapy, exercise therapy, paresis, stroke rehabilitation, muscle spasticity, recovery of function.


    References

    1. Рахимов, М. М., & Хасанов, Б. Д. (2023). Цереброваскулярные заболевания в Узбекистане: эпидемиология и современные тенденции. Неврология, 4(2), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.nevrologiya.19734

    Rakhimov, M. M., & Khasanov, B. D. (2023). Tserebrovaskulyarnye zabolevaniya v Uzbekistane: epidemiologiya i sovremennye tendentsii (Cerebrovascular diseases in Uzbekistan: epidemiology and current trends) [in Russian]. Nevrologiya, 4(2), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.nevrologiya.19734

    1. Becker, B. E. (2009). Aquatic therapy: Scientific foundations and clinical rehabilitation applications. PM&R, 1(9), 859–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.05.017
    2. Kesiktas, N., Paker, N., Erdogan, N., Gülsen, G., Biçki, D., & Yilmaz, H. (2004). The use of hydrotherapy for the management of spasticity. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 18(4), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968304270002
    3. Tripp, F., & Krakow, K. (2014). Effects of an aquatic therapy approach (Halliwick-Therapy) on functional mobility in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical rehabilitation28(5), 432–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215513504942
    4. Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Platz, T., Kugler, J., & Elsner, B. (2018). Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews9(9), CD006876. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub5
    5. Veerbeek, J. M., van Wegen, E., van Peppen, R., van der Wees, P. J., Hendriks, E., Rietberg, M., & Kwakkel, G. (2014). What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e87987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087987
    6. Cramer, S. C., Sur, M., Dobkin, B. H., O'Brien, C., Sanger, T. D., Trojanowski, J. Q., Rumsey, J. M., Hicks, R., Cameron, J., Chen, D., Chen, W. G., Cohen, L. G., deCharms, C., Duffy, C. J., Eden, G. F., Fetz, E. E., Filart, R., Freund, M., Grant, S. J., ... Vinogradov, S. (2011). Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain, 134(6), 1591–1609. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr039

     

    200.png
    © 2026 All Rights Reserved.
    Whatsapp Instagram YouTube Запись на консультацию